Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Indian ports to get improved rail and road connectivity

Sources:
Economic Times (9 May 2010)http://bit.ly/aOuKyl

The government has been pondering rail & road links to ports since quite a while now, but the infrastructure boom in India appears to have given it the final push. In all, 276 projects costing about Rs 55,804 crore have been identified, of which 48 projects have been completed, 70 are under implementation and 89 projects are under planning, according to data from the Shipping Ministry. The projects are part of the government's National Maritime Development Programme, a Rs 61,000-crore project to boost infrastructure at ports. Most of these projects are expected to be executed under the PPP model, which has turned out to be resounding policy success for the government.

While the Economic Times article mentions only the major ports, even some of the larger 'minor' ports are getting upgraded connectivity links. Projects that I know of:

  • Chennai Elevated Tollway between Chennai port and Maduravoyal
  • Upgradation of current road connectivity between Krishnapatnam Port and NH-5, in addition to the new 24km railroad connection from the port to the main trunk line
For further research and reading, I attach a (slightly dated) report by the Indian Planning Commission:

Rail Report

Monday, May 10, 2010

India Railways draft policy papers for private freight/terminal operators!

Attached are two files which I scraped from Google's cache. 

These are the initial version of the Indian Railways draft policy papers that were released on April 9, 2010. They have been removed from the servers, presumably because the drafts are under revision. However for those who did not get a dekko at the initial set, here they are. I will update them as we get the next version.

These policies are directed at improving private participation in what has otherwise been a state monopoly, in line with the IR's push towards a PPP based model. Also, this is in line with the Railways' aim of increasing the share in freight movement to at least 50% compared with 35% now (as mentioned in my previous post http://bit.ly/993xlR).

These are not the only policy papers released on that day. I would be grateful if someone could point me towards where I can get the remaining papers!

1. Draft policy on Special Freight Train Operators (SFTO)
Draft Policy on Special Freight Train Operator (SFTO) 1.0 General


2. Draft policy on Private Freight Terminals (PFT)
Draft Policy on Development of Private Freight Terminal (PFT) 1.0


Thursday, May 6, 2010

Indian Railways jumps on the PPP bandwagon

Sources:
Projects Monitor (22 Feb 2010): http://bit.ly/dCj5IV
Financial Express (15 Apr 2010): http://bit.ly/a1M4IJ
DNA India (4 May 2010): http://bit.ly/btEZ3D


The railway ministry, which till recently used to be on the sidelines when it came to PPP, has jumped on the bandwagon with 37 projects covering 3867km. The estimated investment for these projects is around Rs. 14,300 cr.

Sources from the railway ministry say the estimated rate of return for these projects is expected to range from 7% to 47%. While this is a very wide range, this includes 19 projects that are classified as 'socially desirable'. This means that these projects will be taken up for their social impact, rather than the financial viability of these projects. How exactly the Indian Railways is going to rope in the private sector for these projects is still a big question.

The projects involve doubling of existing lines, gauge conversion and new lines. Officials say that such initiatives aim at supporting the Vision 20-20 statement tabled by the Rail Minister Smt. Mamata Banerjee in December 2009. 

As per plans, more than 30,000 km of route would be of double/ multiple lines, compared with 18,000 km now. Of this, more than 6000 km would be quadrupled lines with segregation of passenger and freight services into separate double-line corridors, with the aim of increasing the share in freight movement to at least 50% compared with 35% now. The ministry also plans to complete additional electrification of 14,000 km in 10 years.

Perhaps with this in mind, the Indian Railways recently announced two draft models for PPP based railway infrastructure development. Both the models would be SPV based, but with different revenue-sharing patterns and land acqisition methods.

By one financing model proposed in the ministry’s draft policy, the Railways will contribute 26% equity in the SPV. The land will be acquired by zonal railway at SPV’s cost but its ownership will vest with the Railways. In return to laying the rail lines, the SPV will get a share in the revenue for 25 years. For project related traffic, the SPV will get 95% of freight apportionment less maintenance cost for the first 10 years and 90% of freight allotment less maintenance cost for next 15 years. Of non-project related traffic, the company will receive 80% of the freight traffic after deducting the maintenance cost for 25 years.

The second model is what is called the ‘private line model’. Here, the private players will lay down new lines on their own land and will share the revenue for 30 years with IR, after which the ownership of the line and land will go to the Railways.

Only new line proposals covering more than 20km, and a minimum rate of return of 14% would be eligible for consideration under this policy. It is also mentioned that the policy would not be applicable to lines intending to provide connectivity to coal mines and iron ore mines directly or indirectly.

Indian Railways has also prepared a draft policy on allowing private players set up freight terminals. As per the draft, providers of logistics services with a minimum of three years’ experience and a minimum net worth of Rs 10 crore at the end of the previous financial year will be allowed to set up such terminals.

As per the draft, the terminal management company would also be entitled to handle third-party cargo against payment of applicable charges including terminal charges, wharfage charges and charges for other value-added services. Depending on market conditions, the company would be free to fix tariff for such services.

While it has been argued that the PPP model is not viable for Indian Railways, especially for projects such as line laying, the model has been steadily gaining favour with railway infrastructure development model overseas. The Finnish Transport Agency, on the 19th of May, is due to present a 76.5km track project to be implemented under the PPP model with a total construction cost of € 263m (http://bit.ly/bZdD8L).

PPP in India: risks, mitigation and financing

Here are a couple of nice reports I found online.

The first of these reports deals with the risks and mitigation strategies that apply to PPP projects:
Risk Mitigation Strategies in PPP Projects


The next report is specific to risks and financing in Road projects under the PPP model:
Financing Road Projects in India Using PPP Scheme


I am not the author, therefore the reports are directly linked to their source. 

Happy reading!

India Infrastructure Reports

The India Infrastructure Report is published annually by 3i, and contains articles and essays by experts on the latest trends and issues in the Indian infrastructure sector. 

The 2009 report deals with land acquisition and R&R, which is fast coming up as one of the major factors in project risks and execution cost, for both private sector projects and government aided PPP projects. Recent land/R&R controversies that come to mind are the Narmada dam issue, Tata Nano in Singur (West Bengal), Vedanta Steel.

The 2008 report is an excellent read for people wishing to get a feel for the PPP models applied in different infrastructure sectors such as roads, power, airports, ports, etc.

Keep an eye open for the 2010 report on this space (not here for another 3-4 months, I reckon); I'll put it up as soon as I find it. But till then, the 2009 & 2008 editions are well worth the read.

India Infrastructure Report 2009: http://bit.ly/bA9Ci3
India Infrastructure Report 2008: http://bit.ly/dwwzFF

Monday, May 3, 2010

Raising debt just became easier! (for infra companies)

Sources:
Economic Times (29 Apr 2010): http://bit.ly/aLi8LE
ICAI.org (ECB guidelines 2004): http://bit.ly/dBxMyR


Infrastructure companies may soon be able to refinance part of their domestic debt through borrowings overseas. This will allow them to raise funding from a wider range of sources, and give them access to cheaper loans as interest rates head higher in India. A high-level committee on ECB, managed jointly by the finance ministry and RBI, had discussed the proposal in relation to funding of power equipment but opened a window to allow refinancing of debt taken for equipment purchases for other infra sectors as well. 

Currently, companies can borrow overseas at an average rate including currency hedging costs at around 9-10% (LIBOR + 450-500 bp spread + 3-4% hedging cost), which is still lower than domestic credit. However, for some sectors in infrastructure like ports which have income in foreign currency, it may turn out to be even cheaper since hedging costs do not have to be accounted for.

Long-term financing is not easily available from the local lenders, particularly banks that have a asset-liability mismatch issue when they provide long-term funding from their deposit funds that typically have a 3-5 year maturity. Moreover, India will need over $1 trillion of funds over the twelfth plan for the infrastructure sector. A greater access to overseas funds will help raise cheaper funds for executing infrastructure projects. 

The selective nature of the relaxation, limiting refinancing to only equipment purchases, was due to concerns over capital inflows and their monetary policy implications. Capital flows into emerging economies such as India are expected to rise with recovery in the global economy. 

The concern was echoed by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor. “The surge in capital flows into some emerging market economies even as the crisis is not yet fully behind us has seen the return of the familiar question - the advisability of imposing a Tobin type tax on capital flows.”